Stolen Wages, Corruption, and Selective Application of the Law: Is APUNCAC a Solution?
Anna Notley and
Bob Hodge
Additional contact information
Anna Notley: School of Law and Criminology, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
Bob Hodge: Institute of Culture and Society, Western Sydney University, Parramatta, NSW 2150, Australia
Laws, 2022, vol. 11, issue 2, 1-10
Abstract:
APUNCAC is a draft international convention designed to address systemic corruption, strengthening UNCAC’s provisions and adding mechanisms to make it more effective. ‘Corruption’ includes public officials abusing their powers. This article addresses an especially insidious form: when laws are created and applied to deny equal protection under the law. Ruling elites control the executive and parliament, to pass laws that selectively target and disadvantage a segment of the population. Our empirical data comes from a historical case, massive government-sanctioned wage theft from Western Australian Aboriginal workers between 1901 and 1972. We use these data to analyse how this kind of corruption works in practice, to evaluate APUNCAC’s measures and strategies, to see what specific measures might be used or modified, and where APUNCAC might need supplementing. We argue that Article 4(3) could have a major impact, especially supported by other Articles and processes, such as dedicated independent courts and strategic engagement with local courts. We evaluate two scenarios: The first scenario is prospective, assuming that APUNCAC is adopted. We evaluate the possible impact of APUNCAC in deterring future corruption involving selective application of the law. The second scenario is retrospective. We evaluate the possible support that APUNCAC might provide regarding court actions that seek redress for potential litigants, such as WA Aboriginal people who were injured in the past.
Keywords: APUNCAC; anticorruption instruments; stolen wages; systemic corruption; rule of law; equality before the law (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D78 E61 E62 F13 F42 F68 K0 K1 K2 K3 K4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/11/2/18/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/11/2/18/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:18-:d:763100
Access Statistics for this article
Laws is currently edited by Ms. Heather Liang
More articles in Laws from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().