Conceptual and Ethical Problems in the Mental Capacity Act 2005: An Interrogation of the Assessment Process

David Gibson
Additional contact information
David Gibson: School of Law, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK

Laws, 2015, vol. 4, issue 2, 1-16

Abstract: Central to the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) is the claim that a conferral of incapacity may not be based on the wisdom of a decision alone. This paper problematizes this position. Values-based medicine is drawn on to explore the process of capacity assessment, highlighting the presence of preconceptions throughout assessment. Two cases before the Court of Protection are examined to bring into focus the complexity of conducting assessment without reference to wisdom. The paper proposes that every stage in the assessment of capacity is undertaken with reference to preconceptions and that an acknowledgement of these, along with transparency about when they are to be employed, would allow for greater clarity about what the MCA demands of practitioners.

Keywords: capacity assessment; Mental Capacity Act 2005; values-based medicine; Anorexia Nervosa; preconceptions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D78 E61 E62 F13 F42 F68 K0 K1 K2 K3 K4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/4/2/229/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/4/2/229/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:4:y:2015:i:2:p:229-244:d:50788

Access Statistics for this article

Laws is currently edited by Ms. Heather Liang

More articles in Laws from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().