EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Collegiality, Therapy and Mediation—The Contribution of Experts in Swedish Mental Health Law

Stefan Sjöström, Maritha Jacobsson and Anna Hollander
Additional contact information
Stefan Sjöström: Department of Social Work, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden
Maritha Jacobsson: Department of Social Work, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden
Anna Hollander: Department of Social Work, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden

Laws, 2017, vol. 6, issue 1, 1-17

Abstract: Independent experts serve a vital role in how the human rights of patients are protected in mental health law. This article investigates the contribution of court-appointed psychiatrists (APs) in civil commitment court hearings. Analysis is based on 12 court hearings that were audiotaped. Supplementary informal interviews with participants were also conducted. Data were analysed through a combination of rhetoric analysis and discourse analysis. Analysis of the hearings reveals that APs do not fulfil their function to critically investigate treating psychiatrists’ (CPs) recommendations that patients meet commitment criteria. They typically do not ask any questions from CPs, and the few questions that are asked do not cast light on the legal issues at stake. To further understand the role of APs, their communication has been analyzed in terms of four interpretative repertoires: collegial, disclosing, therapeutic and mediating. In conclusion, the human rights of patients subjected to involuntary commitment might be at risk when therapeutic concerns are built into the process. The specific Swedish model where APs deliver their own assessment about whether commitment criteria are met may be counterproductive. This argument possibly extends to the role of medical members in mental health tribunals in the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand.

Keywords: experts; court hearings; compulsory psychiatric care; civil commitment; mental health law; human rights; therapeutic jurisprudence; non-adversarial law; interpretative repertoires (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D78 E61 E62 F13 F42 F68 K0 K1 K2 K3 K4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/6/1/2/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/6/1/2/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:6:y:2017:i:1:p:2-:d:88051

Access Statistics for this article

Laws is currently edited by Ms. Heather Liang

More articles in Laws from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-08
Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:6:y:2017:i:1:p:2-:d:88051