Who’s Talking About Us Without Us? A Survivor Research Interjection into an Academic Psychiatry Debate on Compulsory Community Treatment Orders in Ireland
Liz Brosnan
Additional contact information
Liz Brosnan: SURE, Health Service and Population Research, Kings College London, London SE5 8AF, UK
Laws, 2018, vol. 7, issue 4, 1-15
Abstract:
This paper presents a user/survivor researcher perspective to the debate among psychiatrists on the suggested introduction of Community Treatment Orders in Ireland. Critical questions are raised about evidence and the construction of psychiatric knowledge. Important questions include: How is this evidence created? What and whose knowledge have not been considered? Some critical issues around coercion, ‘insight’, and attributions of ‘lack of capacity’ are briefly considered. Further legal considerations are then introduced based on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disability. The paper concludes with a human rights-based appeal to reject the introduction of coercive community treatment in Ireland.
Keywords: community treatment order debate; what is evidence; mental health service user perspectives; survivor research; insight; consent; UN CRPD (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D78 E61 E62 F13 F42 F68 K0 K1 K2 K3 K4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/7/4/33/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/7/4/33/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:7:y:2018:i:4:p:33-:d:171918
Access Statistics for this article
Laws is currently edited by Ms. Heather Liang
More articles in Laws from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().