Offshore Processing Arrangements: Effect on Treaty Ratifications of Receiving States

Margarita Fourer, Natalie Dietrich Jones and Yusuf Ciftci
Additional contact information
Margarita Fourer: Department for E-Governance and Administration, Danube University Krems, 3500 Krems an der Donau, Austria
Natalie Dietrich Jones: Sir Arthur Lewis Institute of Social and Economic Studies, The University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston 7, Jamaica
Yusuf Ciftci: Independent Researcher, London SE3 9QW, UK

Laws, 2020, vol. 9, issue 4, 1-40

Abstract: This article examines offshore processing arrangements of four different time-periods and geo-political regions—the Safe Havens of the United States with Jamaica and the Turks and Caicos Islands; the 2001 and 2012 Pacific Solutions of Australia with Nauru and Papua New Guinea; and the EU–Turkey deal. In examining these arrangements, the article attempts to ascertain whether each of these arrangements had an impact on the ratification of refugee and human rights-related treaties by the states receiving the asylum seekers and refugees for processing and/or settlement. It does so by first assessing the contents of the offshore processing agreements for refugee and human rights clauses and obligations. The article then looks at the general patterns of treaty ratification of each receiving state, prior to its entering into offshore processing arrangements. After the general patterns of treaty ratifications of each state are established, the article goes on to investigate whether offshore processing arrangements had any effect on these patterns. This is based on the analysis of the contents of the agreements, together with an examination of the timing of the refugee and human rights treaty ratifications of the receiving state, at the time of the arrangements. The article finds that the effect, although minimal, is quite nuanced.

Keywords: offshore processing arrangements; treaty ratification; refugees; asylum seekers; US Safe Havens; Pacific Solution; EU–Turkey deal; irregular migration; externalisation policies; deterrence policies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D78 E61 E62 F13 F42 F68 K0 K1 K2 K3 K4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/9/4/23/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/9/4/23/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:9:y:2020:i:4:p:23-:d:434936

Access Statistics for this article

Laws is currently edited by Ms. Heather Liang

More articles in Laws from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().