Customer Perception on Last-Mile Delivery Services Using Kansei Engineering and Conjoint Analysis: A Case Study of Indonesian Logistics Providers

Dian Palupi Restuputri, Ayun Fridawati and Ilyas Masudin
Additional contact information
Dian Palupi Restuputri: Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, 65145, Indonesia
Ayun Fridawati: Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, 65145, Indonesia
Ilyas Masudin: Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, 65145, Indonesia

Logistics, 2022, vol. 6, issue 2, 1-16

Abstract: Background : This article identifies the preferences of the customer of logistics services in Indonesia using the Kansei engineering and conjoint analysis methods. The Conjoint Analysis aims to establish utility scores that represent factors in logistics services. Methods : In this study, 100 respondents from several cities in East Java, Indonesia, are selected to fill out the formal questionnaire. At the same time, 30 respondents are chosen to determine the attributes and level attributes. The analysis to determine attributes, level attributes, and formal questionnaires are assisted by SPSS 25. Sixteen stimuli are generated in this study to be used for a formal questionnaire. In this study, Kansei is used to provide a different perspective to describe the customer service, Including six attributes: delivery services, delivery speed, courier attitude, order information, condition of goods, and warehouse locations. Results : The results show that customers’ most preferred attributes are based on the condition of undamaged objects, and the attitude of the courier is vital for users in this study. Conclusions : The most considered instruments by the customer, such as delivery services, delivery speed, courier attitude, order information, condition of goods, and warehouse location.

Keywords: Kansei engineering; conjoint analysis; logistics service; customer preference (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L8 L80 L81 L86 L87 L9 L90 L91 L92 L93 L98 L99 M1 M10 M11 M16 M19 R4 R40 R41 R49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/6/2/29/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/6/2/29/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:6:y:2022:i:2:p:29-:d:806790

Access Statistics for this article

Logistics is currently edited by Ms. Mavis Li

More articles in Logistics from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().