An Improved Intellectual Capital Management Method for Selecting and Prioritizing Intangible-Related Aspects: A Case Study of Small Enterprise in Thailand
Ratapol Wudhikarn and
Danaitun Pongpatcharatorntep
Additional contact information
Ratapol Wudhikarn: Knowledge and Innovation Management, College of Arts, Media and Technology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
Danaitun Pongpatcharatorntep: Knowledge and Innovation Management, College of Arts, Media and Technology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
Mathematics, 2022, vol. 10, issue 4, 1-23
Abstract:
This study develops a new integrated approach for improving deficiencies relating to executives’ intuitive or illogical decisions, mainly found in past intellectual capital management (ICM) methods. To simultaneously rectify several flaws, the process model of intellectual capital (IC), a traditional ICM method, is integrated using decision science methods—the analytic network process (ANP) and quality function deployment (QFD). The process model of IC is adopted as a core procedure of the proposed ICM approach. ANP is integrated to improve the ability to consider relationships among the IC critical factors and their impacts, while QFD is included to facilitate the systematic consideration and identification of correlations, linkages, and impacts between all IC-related elements from the business concept to strategic plans. The proposed method was applied to two case studies in one real enterprise in Thailand. The results of the implementation reveal the priorities of all IC-related aspects, and the first priority of key success factors (KSFs), key performance indicators (KPIs), and action plans (APs) are all associated with the organization in the structural capital dimension. The results demonstrate that the method may offer advantages with respect to the conceptual expectations and may prioritize critical IC factors and identify their weights. Furthermore, the improved method could indicate the correlations and impacts between related elements, such as critical factors and associated indicators. This study proposes a new comprehensive and systematic management framework by integrating different concepts—decision science methods and the ICM method. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this improved approach has not been explored or proposed in earlier studies.
Keywords: intellectual capital management; multi-criteria decision making; the process model; analytic network process; quality function deployment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/4/626/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/4/626/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:4:p:626-:d:752032
Access Statistics for this article
Mathematics is currently edited by Ms. Emma He
More articles in Mathematics from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().