Non-Parametric Non-Inferiority Assessment in a Three-Arm Trial with Non-Ignorable Missing Data

Wei Li, Yunqi Zhang and Niansheng Tang ()
Additional contact information
Wei Li: Yunnan Key Laboratory of Statistical Modeling and Data Analysis, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China
Yunqi Zhang: Yunnan Key Laboratory of Statistical Modeling and Data Analysis, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China
Niansheng Tang: Yunnan Key Laboratory of Statistical Modeling and Data Analysis, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China

Mathematics, 2023, vol. 11, issue 1, 1-26

Abstract: A three-arm non-inferiority trial including a placebo is usually utilized to assess the non-inferiority of an experimental treatment to a reference treatment. Existing methods for assessing non-inferiority mainly focus on the fully observed endpoints. However, in some clinical trials, treatment endpoints may be subject to missingness for various reasons, such as the refusal of subjects or their migration. To address this issue, this paper aims to develop a non-parametric approach to assess the non-inferiority of an experimental treatment to a reference treatment in a three-arm trial with non-ignorable missing endpoints. A logistic regression is adopted to specify a non-ignorable missingness data mechanism. A semi-parametric imputation method is proposed to estimate parameters in the considered logistic regression. Inverse probability weighting, augmented inverse probability weighting and non-parametric methods are developed to estimate treatment efficacy for known and unknown parameters in the considered logistic regression. Under some regularity conditions, we show asymptotic normality of the constructed estimators for treatment efficacy. A bootstrap resampling method is presented to estimate asymptotic variances of the estimated treatment efficacy. Three Wald-type statistics are constructed to test the non-inferiority based on the asymptotic properties of the estimated treatment efficacy. Empirical studies show that the proposed Wald-type test procedure is robust to the misspecified missingness data mechanism, and behaves better than the complete-case method in the sense that the type I error rates for the former are closer to the pre-given significance level than those for the latter.

Keywords: bootstrap resampling; imputation; non-inferiority assessment; non-ignorable missing data; three-arm trial (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/1/246/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/1/246/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:246-:d:1023559

Access Statistics for this article

Mathematics is currently edited by Ms. Emma He

More articles in Mathematics from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().