Aperiodic Optimal Chronotherapy in Simple Compartment Tumour Growth Models Under Circadian Drug Toxicity Conditions

Byron D. E. Tzamarias, Annabelle Ballesta and Nigel John Burroughs ()
Additional contact information
Byron D. E. Tzamarias: MathSys CDT, Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
Annabelle Ballesta: Inserm U900, Cancer Systems Pharmacology Team, Institut Curie, MINES ParisTech, CBIO, PSL Research University, 35 Rue Dailly, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France
Nigel John Burroughs: SBIDER, Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK

Mathematics, 2024, vol. 12, issue 22, 1-37

Abstract: Cancer cells typically divide with weaker synchronisation with the circadian clock than normal cells, with the degree of decoupling increasing with tumour maturity. Chronotherapy exploits this loss of synchronisation, using drugs with circadian-clock-dependent activity and timed infusion to balance the competing demands of reducing toxicity toward normal cells that display physiological circadian rhythms and of efficacy against the tumour. We analysed optimal chronotherapy for one-compartment nonlinear tumour growth models that were no longer synchronised with the circadian clock, minimising a cost function with a periodically driven running cost accounting for the circadian drug tolerability of normal cells. Using Pontryagin’s Minimum Principle (PMP), we show, for drugs that either increase the cell death rate or kill dividing cells, that optimal solutions are aperiodic bang–bang solutions with two switches per day, with the duration of the daily drug administration increasing as treatment progresses; for large tumours, optimal therapy can in fact switch mid treatment from aperiodic to continuous treatment. We illustrate this with tumours grown under logistic and Gompertz dynamics conditions; for logistic growth, we categorise the different types of solutions. Singular solutions can be applicable for some nonlinear tumour growth models if the per capita growth rate is convex. Direct comparison of the optimal aperiodic solution with the optimal periodic solution shows the former presents reduced toxicity whilst retaining similar efficacy against the tumour. We only found periodic solutions with a daily period in one-compartment exponential growth models, whilst models incorporating nonlinear growth had generic aperiodic solutions, and linear multi-compartments appeared to have long-period (weeks) periodic solutions. Our results suggest that chronotherapy-based optimal solutions under a harmonic running cost are not typically periodic infusion schedules with a 24 h period.

Keywords: chronotherapy; optimal control; non-autonomus dynamical systems; Pontryagin minimum principle (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/22/3516/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/22/3516/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:22:p:3516-:d:1518343

Access Statistics for this article

Mathematics is currently edited by Ms. Emma He

More articles in Mathematics from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().