Let’s Make a Deal: Sleeping Beauty and Monty Hall Are the Same “Paradox”
Stephen Woodcock ()
Additional contact information
Stephen Woodcock: School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, 15 Broadway, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
Mathematics, 2025, vol. 13, issue 23, 1-7
Abstract:
The Monty Hall problem and the Sleeping Beauty paradox are two of the best-known problems in probability theory and information theory. The essence of both is asking what credence a player should give to one of two options, when the options presented have been informed by a decision made by another intelligent agent, based on information unavailable to the player. The solution to the Monty Hall problem is largely well established, but there is no such consensus for Sleeping Beauty. While most commenters advocate for the so-called thirder solution, there remains a robust defence of the dissenting halfer viewpoint. Here, we demonstrate that these two famous problems can be simulated from the same simple experiment and thus are, in fact, entirely equivalent. As such, we also advocate for the thirder solution to Sleeping Beauty, in line with the equivalent result for Monty Hall. Despite this defence of the thirder position, we argue that many of the published statements made in favour of this conclusion are either misleading or incorrect, owing to ambiguous notation regarding frames of reference and knowledge. Similar issues have led to flawed attempts at resolving other paradoxes, including the Two Envelope paradox and the Absent-Minded Driver paradox.
Keywords: probability; paradoxes; information theory; Monty Hall; Sleeping Beauty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/23/3758/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/23/3758/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:23:p:3758-:d:1801169
Access Statistics for this article
Mathematics is currently edited by Ms. Emma He
More articles in Mathematics from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().