TOPSIS Decision on Approximate Pareto Fronts by Using Evolutionary Algorithms: Application to an Engineering Design Problem
Máximo Méndez,
Mariano Frutos,
Fabio Miguel and
Ricardo Aguasca-Colomo
Additional contact information
Máximo Méndez: Instituto Universitario SIANI, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ULPGC), 35017 Las Palmas de G.C., Spain
Mariano Frutos: Department of Engineering, Universidad Nacional del Sur and CONICET, Bahía Blanca 8000, Argentina
Fabio Miguel: Universidad Nacional de Río Negro, Sede Alto Valle y Valle Medio, Villa Regina 8336, Argentina
Ricardo Aguasca-Colomo: Instituto Universitario SIANI, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ULPGC), 35017 Las Palmas de G.C., Spain
Mathematics, 2020, vol. 8, issue 11, 1-27
Abstract:
A common technique used to solve multi-objective optimization problems consists of first generating the set of all Pareto-optimal solutions and then ranking and/or choosing the most interesting solution for a human decision maker (DM). Sometimes this technique is referred to as generate first–choose later. In this context, this paper proposes a two-stage methodology: a first stage using a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) to generate an approximate Pareto-optimal front of non-dominated solutions and a second stage, which uses the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) devoted to rank the potential solutions to be proposed to the DM. The novelty of this paper lies in the fact that it is not necessary to know the ideal and nadir solutions of the problem in the TOPSIS method in order to determine the ranking of solutions. To show the utility of the proposed methodology, several original experiments and comparisons between different recognized MOEAs were carried out on a welded beam engineering design benchmark problem. The problem was solved with two and three objectives and it is characterized by a lack of knowledge about ideal and nadir values.
Keywords: multiple criteria decision-making; TOPSIS; preferences; engineering design; optimization; multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/11/2072/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/11/2072/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:11:p:2072-:d:448110
Access Statistics for this article
Mathematics is currently edited by Ms. Emma He
More articles in Mathematics from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().