EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A Fuzzy Delphi Consensus Methodology Based on a Fuzzy Ranking

Antonio Francisco Roldán López de Hierro, Miguel Sánchez, Daniel Puente-Fernández, Rafael Montoya-Juárez and Concepción Roldán
Additional contact information
Antonio Francisco Roldán López de Hierro: Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of Granada, 18010 Granada, Spain
Miguel Sánchez: Juan XXIII Secondary School, 18010 Granada, Spain
Daniel Puente-Fernández: Department of Nursing, Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC-UGR), University of Granada, 18010 Granada, Spain
Rafael Montoya-Juárez: Department of Nursing, Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC-UGR), University of Granada, 18010 Granada, Spain
Concepción Roldán: Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of Granada, 18010 Granada, Spain

Mathematics, 2021, vol. 9, issue 18, 1-18

Abstract: Delphi multi-round survey is a procedure that has been widely and successfully used to aggregate experts’ opinions about some previously established statements or questions. Such opinions are usually expressed as real numbers and some commentaries. The evolution of the consensus can be shown by an increase in the agreement percentages, and a decrease in the number of comments made. A consensus is reached when this percentage exceeds a certain previously set threshold. If this threshold has not been reached, the moderator modifies the questionnaire according to the comments he/she has collected, and the following round begins. In this paper, a new fuzzy Delphi method is introduced. On the one hand, the experts’ subjective judgments are collected as fuzzy numbers, enriching the approach. On the other hand, such opinions are collected through a computerized application that is able to interpret the experts’ opinions as fuzzy numbers. Finally, we employ a recently introduced fuzzy ranking methodology, satisfying many properties according to human intuition, in order to determine whether the expert’s fuzzy opinion is favorable enough (comparing with a fixed fuzzy number that indicates Agree or Strongly Agree). A cross-cultural validation was performed to illustrate the applicability of the proposed method. The proposed approach is simple for two reasons: it does not need a defuzzification step of the experts’ answers, and it can consider a wide range of fuzzy numbers not only triangular or trapezoidal fuzzy numbers.

Keywords: fuzzy Delphi method; fuzzy number; ranking; consensus; experts’ opinions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/18/2323/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/18/2323/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:18:p:2323-:d:639028

Access Statistics for this article

Mathematics is currently edited by Ms. Emma He

More articles in Mathematics from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:18:p:2323-:d:639028