On the Effectiveness of the Digital Legal Proceedings Model in Russia
Karasev Anatoly Tikhanovich,
Savoskin Alexander Vladimirovich and
Meshcheryagina Veronika Aleksandrovna
Additional contact information
Karasev Anatoly Tikhanovich: Department of Finance and Law, Ural State University of Economics, 620144 Ekaterinburg, Russia
Savoskin Alexander Vladimirovich: Department of Finance and Law, Ural State University of Economics, 620144 Ekaterinburg, Russia
Meshcheryagina Veronika Aleksandrovna: Department of Finance and Law, Ural State University of Economics, 620144 Ekaterinburg, Russia
Mathematics, 2021, vol. 9, issue 2, 1-24
Abstract:
Within the framework of this research, on the basis of the dialectical unity of its legal and mathematical components, on the basis of general scientific (analysis, synthesis, deduction and induction, abstraction, structural and functional method) and special research methods (formal-legal, method of legal construction, formal-logical, system, technical-legal analysis, statistical method, methods of mathematical statistics and probability theory, etc.), a model of digital legal proceedings in Russia is proposed. The article explains the optimal variant between the components of the digital legal proceedings model in Russia, as well as providing an analysis and evaluation of the effectiveness of the digital legal proceedings model and the prospects for the development of digital legal proceedings. It is concluded that there is a need to develop legal regulation in terms of introducing the definition of “electronic evidence”, types of electronic evidence; it is recognized as a positive practice of implementing a video-conferencing system that ensures the implementation of citizens’ rights to participate in a court session, which significantly reduces the time for case consideration; the need to create a single Internet portal for receiving, processing, and providing electronic documents by all authorities in Russia is explained. In this research, it is explained that the use of mathematical algorithms in evaluating evidence and modeling the behavior of participants in trials is now at an early stage of development, which allows them to be used only in the consideration of similar cases.
Keywords: legal proceedings; digitalization; electronic justice; Internet; protection of constitutional rights (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/2/125/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/2/125/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:125-:d:476468
Access Statistics for this article
Mathematics is currently edited by Ms. Emma He
More articles in Mathematics from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().