Adoption of Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines across Journals
Inga Patarčić () and
Jadranka Stojanovski
Additional contact information
Inga Patarčić: Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, 13125 Berlin, Germany
Jadranka Stojanovski: Department of Information Sciences, University of Zadar, 23000 Zadar, Croatia
Publications, 2022, vol. 10, issue 4, 1-10
Abstract:
Journal policies continuously evolve to enable knowledge sharing and support reproducible science. However, that change happens within a certain framework. Eight modular standards with three levels of increasing stringency make Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines which can be used to evaluate to what extent and with which stringency journals promote open science. Guidelines define standards for data citation, transparency of data, material, code and design and analysis, replication, plan and study pre-registration, and two effective interventions: “Registered reports” and “Open science badges”, and levels of adoption summed up across standards define journal’s TOP Factor. In this paper, we analysed the status of adoption of TOP guidelines across two thousand journals reported in the TOP Factor metrics. We show that the majority of the journals’ policies align with at least one of the TOP’s standards, most likely “Data citation” (70%) followed by “Data transparency” (19%). Two-thirds of adoptions of TOP standard are of the stringency Level 1 (less stringent), whereas only 9% is of the stringency Level 3. Adoption of TOP standards differs across science disciplines and multidisciplinary journals (N = 1505) and journals from social sciences (N = 1077) show the greatest number of adoptions. Improvement of the measures that journals take to implement open science practices could be done: (1) discipline-specific, (2) journals that have not yet adopted TOP guidelines could do so, (3) the stringency of adoptions could be increased.
Keywords: transparency and openness promotion; TOP guidelines; TOP Factor; open science; publishing policies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A2 D83 L82 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/10/4/46/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/10/4/46/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:10:y:2022:i:4:p:46-:d:986868
Access Statistics for this article
Publications is currently edited by Ms. Jennifer Zhang
More articles in Publications from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().