Measuring the Impact and Influence of Scientific Activity in the Humanities and Social Sciences

Daniela De Filippo (), Fernanda Morillo and Borja González-Albo
Additional contact information
Daniela De Filippo: Institute of Philosophy (IFS), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), 26-28 Albasanz Street, 28037 Madrid, Spain
Fernanda Morillo: Institute of Philosophy (IFS), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), 26-28 Albasanz Street, 28037 Madrid, Spain
Borja González-Albo: Centre for Human and Social Sciences (CCHS), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), 26-28 Albasanz Street, 28037 Madrid, Spain

Publications, 2023, vol. 11, issue 2, 1-17

Abstract: Scientific activity in the Humanities and Social Sciences (HSS) presents special characteristics that require the use of various sources and methodologies to adequately assess its impact and influence on both academic and non-academic audiences. This study aims to explore the validity of traditional and alternative information sources for the analysis of the characteristics of HSS research and its academic impact and influence (considering social, media, informative and political influence). It is also intended to highlight the differences between Humanities (H) and Social Sciences (SS) and analyse the variables that determine the different types of impact and influence of research in each of them. The following sources of information are used: Web of Science, conCIENCIA (institutional database), Google Scholar, Unpaywall, Altmetric.com and Overton, focused on the study of the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC). The results obtained show that institutional sources make local research visible, which has high percentages of open access. The usefulness of alternative sources to measure social, media, informative and political influence is verified, since HSS publications have an important number of mentions. Significant differences are observed between H and SS in terms of publication coverage (higher in H in the institutional database), language (more Spanish in H), open access (higher percentages in SS) and impact measured through conCIENCIA (the greatest number of documents with a high impact is found in H). In addition, the influence on non-academic audiences is increased by the international orientation of research, the greater academic impact, the participation of SS centres and the immediacy of publications. This study is a starting point for future research, as it explores several tools and data sources to analyse the influence of HSS research on different audiences. A comprehensive analysis will also facilitate the proposal of new metrics applied to the HSS assessment, highlighting its importance for society as a whole.

Keywords: research impact; social influence; media influence; informative influence; political influence; alternative sources of information; Spanish National Research Council (CSIC); Humanities; Social Sciences (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A2 D83 L82 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/11/2/31/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/11/2/31/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:11:y:2023:i:2:p:31-:d:1161937

Access Statistics for this article

Publications is currently edited by Ms. Jennifer Zhang

More articles in Publications from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().