Should I Buy the Current Narrative about Predatory Journals? Facts and Insights from the Brazilian Scenario

Cicero Cena (), Daniel A. Gonçalves and Giuseppe A. Câmara
Additional contact information
Cicero Cena: SISFOTON-Laboratório de Óptica e Fotônica, UFMS-Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande 79070-900, MS, Brazil
Daniel A. Gonçalves: Faculty of Exact Science and Technology, UFGD-Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Dourados 79804-970, MS, Brazil
Giuseppe A. Câmara: LEMA, Institute of Chemistry, UFMS-Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande 79070-900, MS, Brazil

Publications, 2024, vol. 12, issue 1, 1-5

Abstract: The burgeoning landscape of scientific communication, marked by an explosive surge in published articles, journals, and specialized publishers, prompts a critical examination of prevailing assumptions. This article advocates a dispassionate and meticulous analysis to avoid policy decisions grounded in anecdotal evidence or superficial arguments. The discourse surrounding so-called predatory journals has been a focal point within the academic community, with concerns ranging from alleged lack of peer review rigor to exorbitant publication fees. While the consensus often leans towards avoiding such journals, this article challenges the prevailing narrative. It calls for a more nuanced understanding of what constitutes predatory practices and underscores the importance of skeptical inquiry within our daily academic activities. The authors aim to dispel misconceptions and foster a more informed dialogue by scrutinizing APCs, impact factors, and retractions. Furthermore, the authors delve into the evolving landscape of scientific publishing, addressing the generational shifts and emerging trends that challenge traditional notions of prestige and impact. In conclusion, this article serves as a call to action for the scientific community to engage in a comprehensive and nuanced debate on the complex issues surrounding scientific publishing.

Keywords: predatory journals; scientometric; bias (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A2 D83 L82 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/12/1/7/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/12/1/7/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:7-:d:1352372

Access Statistics for this article

Publications is currently edited by Ms. Jennifer Zhang

More articles in Publications from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().