How China Governs Open Science: Policies, Priorities, and Structural Imbalances

Xiaoting Chen, Abdelghani Maddi () and Yanyan Wang
Additional contact information
Xiaoting Chen: School of Information Resources Management, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
Abdelghani Maddi: Groupe d’Étude des Méthodes de l’Analyse Sociologique de la Sorbonne, GEMASS, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, 75017 Paris, France
Yanyan Wang: School of Information Resources Management, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China

Publications, 2025, vol. 13, issue 3, 1-24

Abstract: This article investigates the architecture and institutional distribution of policy tools supporting open science (OS) in China. Based on a corpus of 199 policy documents comprising 25,885 policy statements, we apply an AI-assisted classification to analyze how the Chinese government mobilizes different types of tools. Using Qwen-plus, a large language model developed by Alibaba Cloud and fine-tuned for OS-related content, each policy statement is categorized into one of fifteen subcategories under three main types: supply-oriented, environment-oriented, and demand-oriented tools. Our findings reveal a strong dominance of supply-oriented tools (63%), especially investments in infrastructure, education, and public services. Demand-oriented tools remain marginal (11%), with little use of economic incentives or regulatory obligations. Environment-oriented tools show more balance but still underrepresent key components like incentive systems and legal mandates for open access. To deepen the analysis, we introduce a normalized indicator of institutional focus, which captures the relative emphasis of each policy type across administrative levels. Results show that supply-oriented tools are concentrated at top-level institutions, reflecting a top-down governance model. Demand tools are localized at lower levels, highlighting limited strategic commitment. Overall, China’s OS policy mix prioritizes infrastructure over incentives, limiting systemic transformation toward a more sustainable open science ecosystem.

Keywords: open science policy; policy tools; open science governance; open access (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A2 D83 L82 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/13/3/30/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/13/3/30/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:30-:d:1685527

Access Statistics for this article

Publications is currently edited by Ms. Jennifer Zhang

More articles in Publications from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().