Community Seedbanks in Uganda: Fostering Access to Genetic Diversity and Its Conservation

Rose Nankya, Abdel Kader Naino Jika, Paola De Santis, Hannington Lwandasa, Devra Ivy Jarvis and John Wasswa Mulumba
Additional contact information
Rose Nankya: Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, Uganda Office, Kampala P.O. Box 24384, Uganda
Abdel Kader Naino Jika: Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, 00153 Rome, Italy
Paola De Santis: Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, 00153 Rome, Italy
Hannington Lwandasa: National Agriculture Research Organization of Uganda, Entebbe P.O. Box 295, Uganda
Devra Ivy Jarvis: Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, 00153 Rome, Italy
John Wasswa Mulumba: National Agriculture Research Organization of Uganda, Entebbe P.O. Box 295, Uganda

Resources, 2022, vol. 11, issue 6, 1-11

Abstract: Community seedbanks promote conservation and the use of crop genetic diversity, as well as supporting farmer seed systems. This study analyses seed flow and access to crop genetic diversity over time in the Nakaseke, Rubaya, and Kibuga seedbanks of Uganda. The modes of operation of the banks were compared through scrutinizing records of crops and varieties being conserved, quantities of seed distributed, to whom, and quantities returned. The Nakaseke seed bank distributed the highest varietal diversity of common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris ) and groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea L.), whereas the Rubaya seedbank distributed the highest quantity of common bean seed, followed by the Kibuga seedbank. There were no significant differences between the type of variety of seed, quantities of seed accessed, and seed returned to the seedbanks by women and men—except for the Nakaseke seedbank, where women returned significantly higher quantities of common bean seed. The Kibuga and Rubaya seedbanks dealt with individual farmers, whereas the Nakaseke seedbank dealt with individual farmers and groups. The extent to which core functions were achieved by a particular seedbank depended on the mode of operation, including actors, management, degree of development, socio-economic setting, among others. Further research is recommended to unpack these factors and come up with the most appropriate combinations for greater seedbank effectiveness.

Keywords: community; seedbank; crop; genetic; diversity; conservation; use; core; roles (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/11/6/58/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/11/6/58/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jresou:v:11:y:2022:i:6:p:58-:d:842479

Access Statistics for this article

Resources is currently edited by Ms. Donchian Ma

More articles in Resources from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().