EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Navigating Legal and Regulatory Frameworks to Achieve the Resilience and Sustainability of Indigenous Socioecological Systems

Stephen Chitengi Sakapaji (), Jorge García Molinos, Varvara Parilova, Tuyara Gavrilyeva and Natalia Yakovleva
Additional contact information
Stephen Chitengi Sakapaji: Arctic Research Center, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan
Jorge García Molinos: Arctic Research Center, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan
Varvara Parilova: Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-0845, Japan
Tuyara Gavrilyeva: Institute of Engineering and Technology, North-Eastern Federal University, 677027 Yakutsk, Russia
Natalia Yakovleva: KEDGE Business School, 75012 Paris, France

Resources, 2024, vol. 13, issue 4, 1-24

Abstract: The sustainability of Indigenous Socioecological Systems (ISES) largely depends on well-crafted policy regulations. In particular, Indigenous traditional food systems (ITFS) are an essential component of ISES that provide a variety of culturally accepted, healthy foods while also playing an important role in cultural, spiritual, and economic value to the Indigenous people (IP). Thus, sustainably managing these traditional natural resources must be a priority. As custodians of much of the world’s ecological system, IP have, for generations, exhibited sustainable lifestyles in governing these systems. However, Indigenous perspectives and voices have not been properly reflected in the ISES sustainability discourse, and few comparative case studies have addressed this issue. This study contributes to fill this research gap using a desktop research method based on the Political Ecological Theoretical Framework (PETF) to examine how existing regulatory policies may affect the resilience and sustainability of ISES-ITFS, especially in relation to growing environmental and climatic pressures. Two Indigenous communities, the Karen in Thailand and different Indigenous groups in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) in Russia, are examined as case studies. Our study provides crucial insight that should help the development of robust policy interventions that integrate Indigenous concerns into policies and regulations, emphasizing self-determination, cultural preservation, and land rights. The findings emphasize the necessity for comprehensive legal frameworks prioritizing Indigenous involvement and concerns in climate and sustainability policy implementations. The ultimate goal is to foster meaningful dialogues between policymakers and IP in navigating the climate and sustainability challenges of our time.

Keywords: Indigenous; people; Karen; Yakutia; resilience; sustainability; policy; legal framework (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/13/4/56/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/13/4/56/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jresou:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:56-:d:1371994

Access Statistics for this article

Resources is currently edited by Ms. Donchian Ma

More articles in Resources from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:56-:d:1371994