Developing Composite Indicators for Agricultural Sustainability Assessment: Effect of Normalization and Aggregation Techniques

Byomkesh Talukder, Keith W. Hipel and Gary W. vanLoon
Additional contact information
Byomkesh Talukder: McGill Centre for the Convergence of Health and Economics (MCCHE), McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1X9, Canada
Keith W. Hipel: Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 4B6, Canada
Gary W. vanLoon: School of Environmental Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada

Resources, 2017, vol. 6, issue 4, 1-27

Abstract: The assessment of the sustainability of agricultural systems is multidimensional in nature and requires holistic measures using indicators with different measurements and units reflecting social, economic, and environmental aspects. To simplify the assessment process, various indicators have different units, and measurements are grouped under broad indicator heads, and normalization and/or transformation processes are carried out in order to aggregate them. In this study, a total of 50 indicators from agricultural sustainability categories of productivity, stability, efficiency, durability, compatibility, and equity are employed to investigate which normalization technique is the most suitable for further mathematical analysis for developing a final composite indicator. To understand the consistency and quality of normalization measurement techniques and compare the benefits and drawbacks of the various selected normalization processes, the indicators of agricultural sustainability are considered. Each of the different techniques for normalization has advantages and drawbacks. This study shows that the proportionate normalization and hybrid aggregation rules of the arithmetic mean and the geometric mean are appropriate for the selected data set, and that this technique has a wider applicability for developing composite indicators for agricultural sustainability assessment.

Keywords: composite indicators; normalization; aggregation; agricultural sustainability; coastal agriculture of Bangladesh (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/6/4/66/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/6/4/66/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jresou:v:6:y:2017:i:4:p:66-:d:120331

Access Statistics for this article

Resources is currently edited by Ms. Donchian Ma

More articles in Resources from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().