EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Vital Minimum Amount of Drinking Water Required in Ecuador

Andrés Martínez Moscoso, Víctor Gerardo Aguilar Feijó and Teodoro Verdugo Silva
Additional contact information
Andrés Martínez Moscoso: Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Cuenca, Cuenca 010203, Ecuador
Víctor Gerardo Aguilar Feijó: Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Cuenca, Cuenca 010203, Ecuador
Teodoro Verdugo Silva: Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Cuenca, Cuenca 010203, Ecuador

Resources, 2018, vol. 7, issue 1, 1-16

Abstract: In 2017, the government of Ecuador established the minimum quantity of water required to be provided for free by drinking water utilities. Ecuador recognized the access to water as a fundamental human right because it guarantees the good living, known as “Sumak kawsay”, an indigenous Andean concept, in the Ecuadorian Constitution. This represents a novel approach to water rights in the world, as it is the first attempt to establish a minimum quantity of water under a constitutional guarantee by legislation, rather than regulation or judicial decision. However, this novel legislative approach raises the question of how this minimum amount of free water will impact the most vulnerable members of the Ecuadorian community. This paper provides the results of the first comprehensive research of the minimum required water provision in Ecuador. In order to measure the impact on the income of households, we built a methodology integrating: doctrinaire analyses, normative studies, and economic analyses. According to the Ecuadorian legislation, over-consumption of raw water generates additional costs that must be paid by water companies to the central government. In that regard, there is an inevitable relationship between the efficiency of the service and those additional costs. Efficiency, on this case, is the capacity of water companies (public or private) to provide water services at an adequate price, observing the following parameters: quantity, quality and sufficiency. Our research found that with this legislation in three Ecuadorian local governments (Cuenca, Gualaceo and Suscal), the most vulnerable households (i.e., low-income and/or indigenous households) will be affected the most. This means that and those families will spend the most part of their income on water services otherwise they would have to reduce their water consumption.

Keywords: drinking water; minimum vital of drinking water; human right to water; Ecuador; family income; public services (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/7/1/15/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/7/1/15/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jresou:v:7:y:2018:i:1:p:15-:d:133067

Access Statistics for this article

Resources is currently edited by Ms. Donchian Ma

More articles in Resources from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:7:y:2018:i:1:p:15-:d:133067