Economics at your fingertips  

Volatility Is Log-Normal—But Not for the Reason You Think

Martin Tegnér () and Rolf Poulsen ()
Additional contact information
Martin Tegnér: Department of Engineering & Oxford-Man Institute of Quantitative Finance, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK
Rolf Poulsen: Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2100 København Ø, Denmark

Risks, 2018, vol. 6, issue 2, 1-16

Abstract: It is impossible to discriminate between the commonly used stochastic volatility models of Heston, log-normal, and 3-over-2 on the basis of exponentially weighted averages of daily returns—even though it appears so at first sight. However, with a 5-min sampling frequency, the models can be differentiated and empirical evidence overwhelmingly favours a fast mean-reverting log-normal model.

Keywords: volatility; estimation; Heston; log-normal; 3-over-2; fast mean-reversion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C G0 G1 G2 G3 M2 M4 K2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) (application/pdf) (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this article

Risks is currently edited by Prof. Dr. J. David Cummins

More articles in Risks from MDPI, Open Access Journal
Bibliographic data for series maintained by XML Conversion Team ().

Page updated 2021-01-30
Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:6:y:2018:i:2:p:46-:d:143022