Bail-In or Bail-Out? Correlation Networks to Measure the Systemic Implications of Bank Resolution
Paolo Giudici () and
Laura Parisi ()
Risks, 2019, vol. 7, issue 1, 1-25
We propose a statistical measure, based on correlation networks, to evaluate the systemic risk that could arise from the resolution of a failing or likely-to-fail financial institution, under three alternative scenarios: liquidation, private recapitalization, or bail-in. The measure enhances the observed CDS spreads with a risk premium that derives from contagion effects across financial institutions. The empirical findings reveal that the recapitalization of a distressed bank performed by the other banks in the system and the bail-in resolution minimize the potential losses for the banking sector with respect to the liquidation scenario, thus posing limited systemic risks. A closer comparison between the private intervention recapitalization and the bail-in tool shows that the latter slightly reduces contagion effects with respect to the private intervention scenario.
Keywords: bail-in; bank resolution; Corporate Default Swap (CDS) spreads; financial networks; systemic risk (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C G0 G1 G2 G3 M2 M4 K2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:3-:d:195087
Access Statistics for this article
Risks is currently edited by Prof. Dr. J. David Cummins
More articles in Risks from MDPI, Open Access Journal
Bibliographic data for series maintained by XML Conversion Team ().