Personalizing Child Protection: The Value of Responsivity Factors

Anne M. E. Bijlsma, Claudia E. van der Put, Geertjan Overbeek, Geert Jan J. M. Stams and Mark Assink
Additional contact information
Anne M. E. Bijlsma: Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Claudia E. van der Put: Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Geertjan Overbeek: Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Geert Jan J. M. Stams: Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Mark Assink: Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Social Sciences, 2021, vol. 10, issue 6, 1-19

Abstract: Personalization is an important strategy for enhancing the effectiveness of treatment that is aimed at reducing the risk of child maltreatment. In recent years, a growing body of research has appeared on how child protection can benefit from the principles of the Risk-Need-Responsivity model, but no attention has yet been paid to the implementation of the responsivity principle in child protection. Put simply, this principle states that treatment must be tailored to individual characteristics of clients to optimize its effectiveness. This study was the first to address how the responsivity principle can be of value in child protection. First, a systematic review of responsivity factors in forensic care was performed. Second, the relevance of applying each factor in child protection was examined through interviews with clinical professionals working in the field, who also provided suggestions on how treatment can be tailored to each of these factors. This resulted in an overview of seven responsivity factors all related to caregiver characteristics: problem denial, motivation to cooperate with treatment, psychological problems, cognitive abilities, cultural background, practical barriers such as financial problems and social support, and barriers to specific treatment types such as group therapy. Implications and recommendations for strengthening clinical practice are discussed.

Keywords: child protection; RNR-model; responsivity; caregiver characteristics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A B N P Y80 Z00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/6/205/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/6/205/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:6:p:205-:d:566520

Access Statistics for this article

Social Sciences is currently edited by Ms. Yvonne Chu

More articles in Social Sciences from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().