Rural Proofing Policies for Health: Barriers to Policy Transfer for Australia

I Nyoman Sutarsa, Lachlan Campbell and Malcolm Moore
Additional contact information
I Nyoman Sutarsa: Rural Clinical School, Medical School, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
Lachlan Campbell: Rural Clinical School, Medical School, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
Malcolm Moore: Rural Clinical School, Medical School, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia

Social Sciences, 2021, vol. 10, issue 9, 1-5

Abstract: A ‘rural proofing’ framework, which offers assessment of the potential impacts of policies on rural and remote communities, has been advocated for by state governments and interest groups throughout Australia. It is argued that rural proofing can be used to redress health inequities between urban and rural and remote communities. While implementation of rural proofing in some countries shows promising results, there are many social and spatial contexts that should be considered prior to its adoption in Australia. Rural proofing is not the best option for rural health policy in Australia. It has been imported from communities where the urban/rural divide is minimal. It is based on a rigid urban/rural binary model that targets disparity rather than accommodating the diversity of rural communities. Rural proofing concentrates on tick-the-box activities, where rural communities are not sufficiently consulted. There is no unified federal ministry in Australia with responsibility for rural and remote affairs. Considering potential shortcomings of rural proofing for health policies, it is imperative for Australia to have a specific rural health policy at both federal and state levels.

Keywords: rural proofing; health service; healthcare; health policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A B N P Y80 Z00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/9/338/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/9/338/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:9:p:338-:d:631784

Access Statistics for this article

Social Sciences is currently edited by Ms. Yvonne Chu

More articles in Social Sciences from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().