Ambivalence in Child Protection Proceedings: Parents’ Views on Their Interactions with Child Protection Authorities
Aline Schoch and
Gaëlle Aeby
Additional contact information
Aline Schoch: Institute for Studies in Children and Youth Services, School of Social Work, University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland FHNW, 4132 Muttenz, Switzerland
Gaëlle Aeby: Centre for Evaluation and Legislative Studies, Faculty of Law, University of Geneva, 1211 Genève, Switzerland
Social Sciences, 2022, vol. 11, issue 8, 1-14
Abstract:
Child protection is a field characterized by intrinsic tensions and ambivalence, related to the state’s intervention in the family sphere and to a double mandate of care and control. This article focuses on the participation of parents in statutory child protection proceedings and the ambivalence they experience in their interactions with the Child and Adult Protection Authority in Switzerland (CAPA). The aim is to explore parents’ views on what they consider as hindering or enabling in their interactions with the CAPA in order to be able to fully participate in child protection proceedings. The article is based on a large interdisciplinary research project including multi-perspective cases collected in four cantons of Switzerland and puts the focus on in-depth interviews with ten birth parents. Results show that ambivalence is inherent to the interactions between parents and the CAPA, as the mere opening of child protection proceedings is experienced as a threat to the parents’ integrity. Establishing trust, recognizing parents’ expertise and acknowledging their needs are key to re-establishing parental integrity, which seems to be a fundamental pre-requisite for reducing ambivalence and enhancing participation in child protection proceedings.
Keywords: child protection; parents; ambivalence; recognition; participation; integrity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A B N P Y80 Z00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/8/329/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/8/329/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:329-:d:873641
Access Statistics for this article
Social Sciences is currently edited by Ms. Yvonne Chu
More articles in Social Sciences from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().