Agency and the Limits of Responsibility: Co-Management of Technology-Enabled Care in Supported Housing

Regina C. Serpa (), Steve Rolfe, Grant Gibson, Julia Lawrence and Vikki McCall
Additional contact information
Regina C. Serpa: Department of Sociology, Social Policy & Criminology, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK
Steve Rolfe: Department of Sociology, Social Policy & Criminology, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK
Grant Gibson: Department of Sociology, Social Policy & Criminology, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK
Julia Lawrence: Department of Sociology, Social Policy & Criminology, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK
Vikki McCall: Department of Sociology, Social Policy & Criminology, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK

Social Sciences, 2023, vol. 12, issue 4, 1-13

Abstract: Since at least 2012, UK housing providers (and policy makers) have introduced policies aimed at developing autonomy and independence among service users, through an agenda sometimes referred to as ‘responsibilisation’. This paper considers the role that technologies play in this agenda, through an analysis of how wellbeing and independence are facilitated amongst older social housing tenants. Based on case studies of four supported housing schemes in England, the research considers the capacity to exercise agency amongst older persons, through their willingness and ability to accept technological interventions, and the role of support networks to facilitate independent living. Using the concept of modalities of agency, the research examines the impact of implementing ‘low-level’ assistive technologies in the home, based on the perspectives of residents and staff. The interventions studied were designed to improve social relationships, promote self-sufficiency and support self-managed care (based on the principle that the most effective projects facilitate individual agency). The research findings identified that residents responded differentially to technology, based on their levels of capability, motivation, reluctance and resistance. Whilst the study demonstrated that small technological innovations could have disproportionately positive impacts in improving wellbeing, the research demonstrates the complex nature of agency and limits of responsibility. The paper argues that responsibilisation is part of a wider neoliberal project, where choice and agency are manufactured to create an idealised notion of the autonomous actor (in this case through technology-enabled care). The article argues that a collaborative approach to service provision in which responsibility is shared, via co-managed care, is a more effective means of enhancing agency, than one which advocates a withdrawal of support (in the guise of autonomy).

Keywords: technology-enabled care; co-management; ageing; supported housing; responsibilisation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A B N P Y80 Z00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/4/248/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/4/248/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:248-:d:1127496

Access Statistics for this article

Social Sciences is currently edited by Ms. Yvonne Chu

More articles in Social Sciences from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().