Comparison of Perceived Achievement of Complex Thinking Competency Among American, European, and Asian University Students
José Carlos Vázquez-Parra (),
Jenny Paola Lis-Gutiérrez,
Linda Carolina Henao-Rodriguez,
Carlos Enrique George-Reyes,
Claudia Lorena Tramon-Pregnan,
Susana Del Río-Urenda,
Ma Esther B. Chio and
Rasikh Tariq
Additional contact information
José Carlos Vázquez-Parra: Institute for the Future of Education, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey 64700, Mexico
Jenny Paola Lis-Gutiérrez: School of Business, Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz, Bogotá 110231, Colombia
Linda Carolina Henao-Rodriguez: School of Business, Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz, Bogotá 110231, Colombia
Carlos Enrique George-Reyes: Institute for the Future of Education, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey 64700, Mexico
Claudia Lorena Tramon-Pregnan: School of Agricultural Engineering, Universidad de Concepción, Chillán 3812120, Chile
Susana Del Río-Urenda: Department of Nursing and Podiatry, Universidad de Málaga, 29016 Málaga, Spain
Ma Esther B. Chio: Department of Information Technology, University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, Cagayan de Oro 9000, Philippines
Rasikh Tariq: Institute for the Future of Education, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey 64700, Mexico
Social Sciences, 2025, vol. 14, issue 1, 1-18
Abstract:
Despite the growing focus of educational institutions on students’ practical abilities beyond theoretical knowledge, the perception that students have of their competencies is crucial for their effective application in professional contexts. Accordingly, this paper reports a study of 435 university students attending ten universities in eight countries in the Americas (Chile, Colombia, Mexico), Asia (Pakistan and the Philippines), and Europe (Spain, Finland, and Serbia). The goal was to measure their perceptions of their achievement of complex thinking competency and its sub-competencies. The intention was to identify how cultural, educational, and socioeconomic differences among countries account for the variances in the students’ self-assessment of competencies, impacting their professional preparedness. The study focused on the competency of complex thinking, considering its critical importance in solving current environmental problems. The analysis employed the non-parametric Brown–Forsythe statistical test and Bonferroni correction, given the non-normality and heteroscedasticity of the data. It was found that (i) there is no statistically significant difference by gender; (ii) there are statistically significant differences in all types of thinking per country, geographical area (continent), and Human Development Index (HDI).
Keywords: professional education; educational innovation; complex thinking; lifelong learning; higher education (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A B N P Y80 Z00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/1/42/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/1/42/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:1:p:42-:d:1566929
Access Statistics for this article
Social Sciences is currently edited by Ms. Yvonne Chu
More articles in Social Sciences from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().