Australian Value or Political Rhetoric? The Media’s Use of the Fair Go in Australia

Ashleigh Marie Pantaleo, Matthew James Phillips (), Antonia Hendrick and Brian Bishop
Additional contact information
Ashleigh Marie Pantaleo: School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley 6102, Australia
Matthew James Phillips: School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley 6102, Australia
Antonia Hendrick: School of Allied Health, University of Western Australia, Perth 6847, Australia
Brian Bishop: School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley 6102, Australia

Social Sciences, 2025, vol. 14, issue 4, 1-23

Abstract: Deceivingly simple and often colloquial, the Fair Go is pervasive to the Australian lexicon and a feature of the projected national identity. The Fair Go has historically been used as a plea for fairness in contexts where there is perceived injustice. The Australian media hold significant power to shape public perceptions and debate, including those around fairness; however, there is a limited understanding as to how the Australian media use the term. Examining the use of the Fair Go by the Australian media allowed for greater understanding of the role that the Fair Go plays within Australian society. A media frame analysis was conducted to explore the Australian media’s use of the Fair Go, revealing that the Australian media imbued the Fair Go with complex power dynamics. Re-enforcing the Fair Go as a narrative of injustice, the Australian media used the Fair Go to both personalise and politicise experiences of disadvantage through dominant humanisation and responsibility narratives. The results demonstrate how the often used, yet simplistic, façade of the term masks the complexity and power that the media have imbued the Fair Go with. Furthermore, the findings raise questions surrounding the media’s use of the term and the legitimacy of the Fair Go as a moniker of injustice.

Keywords: fairness; disadvantage; framing; qualitative; justice; politics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A B N P Y80 Z00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/4/198/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/4/198/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:198-:d:1619327

Access Statistics for this article

Social Sciences is currently edited by Ms. Yvonne Chu

More articles in Social Sciences from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().