The Secret of Self-Made: The Potential of Different Types of Consumer Participation for Product Attachment and Commercial Value

Sarah Diefenbach, Svetlana Jung, Thomas Diller, Christina Franze and Stina Maciejczyk
Additional contact information
Sarah Diefenbach: Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Department of Psychology, Leopoldstr. 13, 80802 Munich, Germany
Svetlana Jung: Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Department of Psychology, Leopoldstr. 13, 80802 Munich, Germany
Thomas Diller: Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Department of Psychology, Leopoldstr. 13, 80802 Munich, Germany
Christina Franze: Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Department of Psychology, Leopoldstr. 13, 80802 Munich, Germany
Stina Maciejczyk: Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Department of Psychology, Leopoldstr. 13, 80802 Munich, Germany

Social Sciences, 2018, vol. 7, issue 4, 1-19

Abstract: Consumer participation in the product production process offers chances for consumers and marketers alike, promising a better fit to consumer needs, a more fulfilling product relationship, and a higher willingness to pay (WTP). To exploit this potential, a key question is as to what type of participation evokes the most positive effects with respect to product attachment and commercial value. Two experimental studies in different product domains (cloth bag design and smartphone customization) explore the specific effects of self-creation versus self-design (study 1, N = 106) and functional versus cosmetic customization (study 2, N = 272). Study 1 highlighted the role of product attachment as a mediator of WTP and the role of experienced effort related to consumer participation as one chance to create such attachment. The specific type of consumer participation appeared to be less decisive, i.e., self-design and self-creation appeared to be equally successful for creating product attachment. Study 2 revealed cosmetic customization to be more related to product attachment, functional customization to be more related to WTP, and both in combination as most effective. In addition to a number of theoretical and practical contributions to the psychological understanding and successful design of consumer participation, the present study highlights several aspects for future exploration such as potential backfire effects of customization.

Keywords: consumer participation; self-design versus self-creation; cosmetic versus functional customization; product attachment; willingness to pay (WTP) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A B N P Y80 Z00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/4/52/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/4/52/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:4:p:52-:d:138425

Access Statistics for this article

Social Sciences is currently edited by Ms. Yvonne Chu

More articles in Social Sciences from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().