Community-Engaged Research Builds a Nature-Culture of Hope on North American Great Plains Rangelands

Hailey Wilmer, Lauren M. Porensky, María E. Fernández-Giménez, Justin D. Derner, David J. Augustine, John P. Ritten and Dannele P. Peck
Additional contact information
Hailey Wilmer: Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA
Lauren M. Porensky: Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA
María E. Fernández-Giménez: Forest and Rangeland Stewardship Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
Justin D. Derner: Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA
David J. Augustine: Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA
John P. Ritten: Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA
Dannele P. Peck: Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA

Social Sciences, 2019, vol. 8, issue 1, 1-26

Abstract: In the North American Great Plains, multigenerational ranches and grassland biodiversity are threatened by dynamic and uncertain climatic, economic, and land use processes. Working apart, agricultural and conservation communities face doubtful prospects of reaching their individual goals of sustainability. Rangeland research could serve a convening platform, but experimental studies seldom involve local manager communities. The Collaborative Adaptive Rangeland Management (CARM) project, however, has undertaken a ten-year, ranch-level, participatory research effort to explore how community-engaged research can increase our understanding of conservation and ranching goals. Using ethnographic data and the nature-culture concept—which recognizes the inseparability of ecological relationships that are shaped by both biological and social processes—we examine the CARM team’s process of revising their management objectives (2016–2018). In CARM’s early days, the team established locally-relevant multifunctional goals and objectives. As team members’ understanding of the ecosystem improved, they revised objectives using more spatially, temporally and ecologically specific information. During the revision process, they challenged conventional ecological theories and grappled with barriers to success outside of their control. The emerging CARM nature-culture, based on a sense of place and grounded in hope, provides insights into effective community-engaged research to enhance rangeland livelihood and conservation outcomes.

Keywords: collaborative adaptive management; goals and objectives; natural resource management; grassland bird conservation; sense of place (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A B N P Y80 Z00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/8/1/22/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/8/1/22/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:22-:d:197120

Access Statistics for this article

Social Sciences is currently edited by Ms. Yvonne Chu

More articles in Social Sciences from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().