Professional Values Challenged by Case Management—Theorizing Practice in Child Protection with Reflexive Practitioners

Edgar Marthinsen, Graham Clifford, Halvor Fauske and Willy Lichtwarck
Additional contact information
Edgar Marthinsen: Department of Social Work, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway
Graham Clifford: Department of Social Work, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway
Halvor Fauske: Department of Social Work, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Postboks 400, 2418 Elverum, Norway
Willy Lichtwarck: Department of Social Work, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway

Social Sciences, 2020, vol. 9, issue 4, 1-16

Abstract: In this article, we theorize and reflect based on former research into professional practice and discretion as well as use some results from working together with practitioners in child protection services to explore the phenomenon of non-performing. Regulation lies at the heart of the contemporary child protection discourse. On the one hand we have seen a trend towards systematization of assessment content and procedures, on the other hand it is assumed that rational management approaches can secure consistency of performance. Social workers may be weary of the constraints all this imposes, but seem generally content to comply. Our reasoning was that social workers in child protection should be helped to get to grips with modifications to practice so that multi-challenged families could be accorded priority. These changes would include a reframing of assessment to take account of family needs as well as the needs of children. Follow-up would also require much more attention. Additionally, the choice of help provided for children and families would have to come into better focus, despite the limitations often experienced in practice. The question we asked was whether these types of reframing could be fostered within local child welfare units. We conducted a field trial in which child protection units were encouraged to reframe their practices, with the support of an expert group. The idea was to enhance and enable innovation through the combination of a more thorough dialogue with the families involved, as well as critical reflection based on available knowledge related to the identified challenges. We do a critical discussion of the work and the results from this in order to enhance knowledge on innovation in child protection.

Keywords: child protection; social work; complexity theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A B N P Y80 Z00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/4/44/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/4/44/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:9:y:2020:i:4:p:44-:d:342923

Access Statistics for this article

Social Sciences is currently edited by Ms. Yvonne Chu

More articles in Social Sciences from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().