Disaggregating the Asian “Other”: Heterogeneity and Methodological Issues in Research on Asian Americans with Disabilities
Rooshey Hasnain,
Glenn T. Fujiura,
John E. Capua,
Tuyen Thi Thanh Bui and
Safiy Khan
Additional contact information
Rooshey Hasnain: Department of Disability and Human Development, Institute on Disability and Human Development, and Undergraduate Rehabilitation Sciences Program, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60608, USA
Glenn T. Fujiura: Department of Disability and Human Development, Institute on Disability and Human Development, and Undergraduate Rehabilitation Sciences Program, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60608, USA
John E. Capua: New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10065, USA
Tuyen Thi Thanh Bui: School of Social Work, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
Safiy Khan: Department of Disability and Human Development, Institute on Disability and Human Development, and Undergraduate Rehabilitation Sciences Program, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60608, USA
Societies, 2020, vol. 10, issue 3, 1-19
Abstract:
Asian Americans comprise the fastest growing racial or ethnic group in the US. Between 2000 and 2019, their numbers almost doubled, from 11.9 million to 22.2 million. The numbers of people with disabilities within this demographically important population, which are also growing, puts stress on the service delivery sector. This situation indicates a pressing need for research on lived experiences of disabled Asian Americans. A review of the extant literature shows that Asian Americans are underrepresented in the research on disability and/or mental health. This lack of hard data is compounded by the tendency to treat Asian ethnicities as monolithic. The US Census Bureau recognizes more than 20 distinct Asian nationalities, ranging from South Asian Pakistani Americans to Southeast Asian Americans. Aggregating all Asian Americans together in surveys and studies impedes a sophisticated understanding of their unique needs and strengths. From a policy or systems perspective, inadequate data representation in the research literature, including outdated conclusions, is an implicit form of disenfranchisement. This conceptual article examines issues and implications around the lack of systematic attention to diversity within the Asian American population in disability research.
Keywords: research methods; disparity; disaggregating data; Asian Americans; disability; mental health; model minority myth (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A13 A14 P P0 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 Z1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/10/3/58/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/10/3/58/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:58-:d:390792
Access Statistics for this article
Societies is currently edited by Ms. Farrah Sun
More articles in Societies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().