Implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: A Comparison of Four European Countries with Regards to Assistive Technologies
Tanja Bratan,
Piret Fischer,
Maria Maia and
Vera Aschmann
Additional contact information
Tanja Bratan: Business Unit Innovations in the Health System, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI), 76139 Karlsruhe, Germany
Piret Fischer: Business Unit Innovations in the Health System, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI), 76139 Karlsruhe, Germany
Vera Aschmann: Department of Chemistry and Life Sciences, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 761312 Karlsruhe, Germany
Societies, 2020, vol. 10, issue 4, 1-25
Abstract:
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) is an international treaty that aims to promote, protect and ensure the rights of persons with disabilities so that they can fully participate in society and enjoy the same freedoms and opportunities as others. It provides an important framework for the inclusion of persons with disabilities with the help of Assistive Technologies (AT). This paper assesses and compares the implementation of the CRPD with regards to the availability of AT in four countries (Germany, Hungary, Portugal and Sweden), which to some extent represent different European regions. The paper is based on a review of relevant academic literature, the DOTCOM database and regulatory documents as well as on five validation interviews with national experts. In the countries studied, anti-discriminatory and other legislation is included at the highest level of the legal framework and contains detailed rules on definitions, remedies and legal procedures. There are specific prohibitions in several fields, such as employment, housing, and healthcare. Nonetheless, there are still cases of non-compliance with the CRPD and of laws and regulations which discriminate against persons with a disability. Additionally, there are great variations between countries. As very positive examples of favourable regulatory frameworks for furthering inclusion with the help of ATs do exist, there may be benefit in raising awareness of such examples to support other countries in developing their own measures.
Keywords: CRPD; persons with disabilities; inclusion; regulatory environment; assistive technologies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A13 A14 P P0 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 Z1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/10/4/74/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/10/4/74/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:74-:d:419521
Access Statistics for this article
Societies is currently edited by Ms. Farrah Sun
More articles in Societies from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().