EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Bootstrap Assessment of Crop Area Estimates Using Satellite Pixels Counting

Cristiano Ferraz, Jacques Delincé, André Leite and Raydonal Ospina
Additional contact information
Cristiano Ferraz: Computational Agricultural Statistics Laboratory—CASTLab, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50740-540, Brazil
Jacques Delincé: Independent Researcher, 1330 Rixensart, Belgium
André Leite: Computational Agricultural Statistics Laboratory—CASTLab, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50740-540, Brazil
Raydonal Ospina: Computational Agricultural Statistics Laboratory—CASTLab, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50740-540, Brazil

Stats, 2022, vol. 5, issue 2, 1-18

Abstract: Crop area estimates based on counting pixels over classified satellite images are a promising application of remote sensing to agriculture. However, such area estimates are biased, and their variance is a function of the error rates of the classification rule. To redress the bias, estimators (direct and inverse) relying on the so-called confusion matrix have been proposed, but analytic estimators for variances can be tricky to derive. This article proposes a bootstrap method for assessing statistical properties of such estimators based on information from a sample confusion matrix. The proposed method can be applied to any other type of estimator that is built upon confusion matrix information. The resampling procedure is illustrated in a small study to assess the biases and variances of estimates using purely pixel counting and estimates provided by both direct and inverse estimators. The method has the advantage of being simple to implement even when the sample confusion matrix is generated under unequal probability sample design. The results show the limitations of estimates based solely on pixel counting as well as respective advantages and drawbacks of the direct and inverse estimators with respect to their feasibility, unbiasedness, and variance.

Keywords: error matrix; image classification; confusion matrix; resampling; inverse calibration (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C1 C10 C11 C14 C15 C16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/5/2/25/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/5/2/25/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jstats:v:5:y:2022:i:2:p:25-439:d:801802

Access Statistics for this article

Stats is currently edited by Mrs. Minnie Li

More articles in Stats from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:5:y:2022:i:2:p:25-439:d:801802