Implementation Aspects in Invariance Alignment

Alexander Robitzsch ()
Additional contact information
Alexander Robitzsch: IPN—Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, Olshausenstraße 62, 24118 Kiel, Germany

Stats, 2023, vol. 6, issue 4, 1-19

Abstract: In social sciences, multiple groups, such as countries, are frequently compared regarding a construct that is assessed using a number of items administered in a questionnaire. The corresponding scale is assessed with a unidimensional factor model involving a latent factor variable. To enable a comparison of the mean and standard deviation of the factor variable across groups, identification constraints on item intercepts and factor loadings must be imposed. Invariance alignment (IA) provides such a group comparison in the presence of partial invariance (i.e., a minority of item intercepts and factor loadings are allowed to differ across groups). IA is a linking procedure that separately fits a factor model in each group in the first step. In the second step, a linking of estimated item intercepts and factor loadings is conducted using a robust loss function L 0.5 . The present article discusses implementation alternatives in IA. It compares the default L 0.5 loss function with L p with other values of the power p between 0 and 1. Moreover, the nondifferentiable L p loss functions are replaced with differentiable approximations in the estimation of IA that depend on a tuning parameter ε (such as, e.g., ε = 0.01 ). The consequences of choosing different values of ε are discussed. Moreover, this article proposes the L 0 loss function with a differentiable approximation for IA. Finally, it is demonstrated that the default linking function in IA introduces bias in estimated means and standard deviations if there is noninvariance in factor loadings. Therefore, an alternative linking function based on logarithmized factor loadings is examined for estimating factor means and standard deviations. The implementation alternatives are compared through three simulation studies. It turned out that the linking function for factor loadings in IA should be replaced by the alternative involving logarithmized factor loadings. Furthermore, the default L 0.5 loss function is inferior to the newly proposed L 0 loss function regarding the bias and root mean square error of factor means and standard deviations.

Keywords: confirmatory factor analysis; multiple groups; measurement invariance; invariance alignment; alignment optimization; robust loss function (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C1 C10 C11 C14 C15 C16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/6/4/73/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/6/4/73/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jstats:v:6:y:2023:i:4:p:73-1178:d:1267377

Access Statistics for this article

Stats is currently edited by Mrs. Minnie Li

More articles in Stats from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().