Estimator Comparison for the Prediction of Election Results
Miltiadis S. Chalikias (),
Georgios X. Papageorgiou and
Dimitrios P. Zarogiannis
Additional contact information
Miltiadis S. Chalikias: Department of Accounting and Finance, University of West Attica, 12244 Egaleo, Greece
Georgios X. Papageorgiou: Department of Accounting and Finance, University of West Attica, 12244 Egaleo, Greece
Dimitrios P. Zarogiannis: Department of Accounting and Finance, University of West Attica, 12244 Egaleo, Greece
Stats, 2024, vol. 7, issue 3, 1-14
Abstract:
Cluster randomized experiments and estimator comparisons are well-documented topics. In this paper, using the datasets of the popular vote in the presidential elections of the United States of America (2012, 2016, 2020), we evaluate the properties (SE, MSE) of three cluster sampling estimators: Ratio estimator, Horvitz–Thompson estimator and the linear regression estimator. While both the Ratio and Horvitz–Thompson estimators are widely used in cluster analysis, we propose a linear regression estimator defined for unequal cluster sizes, which, in many scenarios, performs better than the other two. The main objective of this paper is twofold. Firstly, to indicate which estimator is most suited for predicting the outcome of the popular vote in the United States of America. We do so by applying the single-stage cluster sampling technique to our data. In the first partition, we use the 50 states plus the District of Columbia as primary sampling units, whereas in the second one, we use 3112 counties instead. Secondly, based on the results of the aforementioned procedure, we estimate the number of clusters in a sample for a set standard error while also considering the diminishing returns from increasing the number of clusters in the sample. The linear regression estimator is best in the majority of the examined cases. This type of comparison can also be used for the estimation of any other country’s elections if prior voting results are available.
Keywords: cluster sampling; ratio estimator; Horvitz–Thompson estimator; linear regression estimator (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C1 C10 C11 C14 C15 C16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/7/3/40/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/7/3/40/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jstats:v:7:y:2024:i:3:p:40-684:d:1427053
Access Statistics for this article
Stats is currently edited by Mrs. Minnie Li
More articles in Stats from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().