The Impact of Perceived Value on Farmers’ Regret Mood Tendency
Wenmei Liao,
Dong Xiang,
Meiqiu Chen,
Jiangli Yu and
Qianfeng Luo
Additional contact information
Wenmei Liao: The Research Base on Rural Land Resources Use and Protection, School of Economics and Management, Jiangxi Agriculture University, 1101 Zhimin Street, Changbei Economic and Technological Development Zone, Nanchang 330045, China
Dong Xiang: China Institute for Micro, Small and Medium-sized Enterprises, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), 3501 Daxue Rd., Jinan 250000, China
Meiqiu Chen: The Research Base on Rural Land Resources Use and Protection, School of Economics and Management, Jiangxi Agriculture University, 1101 Zhimin Street, Changbei Economic and Technological Development Zone, Nanchang 330045, China
Jiangli Yu: College of Business Administration, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea
Qianfeng Luo: School of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Renmin University of China, No. 59 Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District, Beijing 100872, China
Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, issue 10, 1-14
Abstract:
Based on a survey of the poverty alleviation resettlement (PAR) farmers in China, this paper aims to investigate the relationship between the expected value, perceived value and regret mood of the relocated farmers. The results show that the expected value can positively affect the perceived value, and the latter negatively impact the regret mood of the PAR farmers. On average, the farmers with regret and non-regret sentiments are approximately fifty/fifty in percentage terms. Internal factors, such as demand levels, and external factors, such as relocation costs, also have significant effects on the regret mood of farmers after they have relocated. However, those factors have significant differences in their impacts on poor and non-poor households. Several political implications are also provided.
Keywords: poverty alleviation immigration; relocated farmers; expected value; perceived value; regret mood (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3650/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3650/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:10:p:3650-:d:175087
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().