Global Warming and Acidification Potential Assessment of a Collective Manure Management System for Bioenergy Production and Nitrogen Removal in Northern Italy

Giorgio Provolo, Gabriele Mattachini, Alberto Finzi, Martina Cattaneo, Viviana Guido and Elisabetta Riva
Additional contact information
Giorgio Provolo: Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy
Gabriele Mattachini: Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy
Alberto Finzi: Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy
Martina Cattaneo: Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy
Viviana Guido: Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy
Elisabetta Riva: Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy

Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, issue 10, 1-18

Abstract: Collective manure processing facilities to reduce nutrient loads and produce renewable energy are often proposed as feasible solutions in intensive livestock production areas. However, the transferring of effluents from farms to the treatment plant and back to farms, as well as the treatment operations themselves, must be carefully evaluated to assure the environmental sustainability of the solution. This study evaluated the global warming potential (GWP) and acidification potential (AP) of a collective treatment plant for bioenergy production and nitrogen removal as an alternative strategy to conventional on-farm manure management systems. Two manure management scenarios were compared: manure management on individual farms and management by a collective treatment plant. Data were collected at a collective processing plant and at the individual farms of the consortium to estimate emissions of CO 2 , CH 4 , N 2 O, NO x , NH 3 and SO 2 . The plant receives manure from 21 livestock production units, treating 660 tonnes day −1 of manure. The GWP and AP indicators were calculated to evaluate the potential impact of the two management solutions. The collective solution reduced both GWP (−52%) and AP (−43%) compared to manure management separately by each farm. Further improvement might be obtained in both indicators by introducing mitigation techniques in farm manure storage and manure application to soil.

Keywords: environmental assessment; centralised treatment; gaseous emissions; anaerobic digestion; livestock manure; aerobic treatment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3653/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3653/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:10:p:3653-:d:175155

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().