Examining the Conflicting Relationship between U.S. National Parks and Host Communities: Understanding a Community’s Diverging Perspectives

Jae Ho Lee, David Matarrita-Cascante, Ying Xu and Michael Schuett
Additional contact information
Jae Ho Lee: Department of Recreation, Park and Tourism Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
David Matarrita-Cascante: Department of Recreation, Park and Tourism Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
Ying Xu: Department of Tourism Management, Shaanxi Normal University, No. 620, Chang’an Street, Chang’an, Xi’an 710119, China
Michael Schuett: Department of Recreation, Park and Tourism Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA

Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, issue 10, 1-17

Abstract: The growing importance of participatory and collaborative approaches in resource management has resulted in an increased emphasis on identifying the complex relationships between natural national parks and neighboring rural communities. Given the limited number of studies dealing with parks beyond rural areas, our exploratory case study examines how conflict stemming from diverse community stakeholders’ perspectives and values in regard to the San Antonio Missions National Historical Park influences their involvement and attitudes toward park management. Thirty-two interviews were conducted and analyzed using a content-analysis methodology. Guided by the Progress Triangle conflict management framework, each stakeholder’s views, interests, and aspirations associated with the missions were organized according to the framework’s three dimensions: Substance, procedure, and relationship. The study findings discussed how stakeholders’ varying perspectives regarding cultural resources influenced their interactions with urban historical national parks and their attitudes toward park management. Furthermore, how stakeholders can reconcile their differences through a collaborative approach for better park management was discussed.

Keywords: park–community relationships; stakeholder perceptions; historical parks; collaboration (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3667/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3667/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:10:p:3667-:d:175441

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().