EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Financial Feasibility and Social Acceptance for Reducing Nuclear Power Plants: A Contingent Valuation Study

JongRoul Woo (), Sesil Lim (), Yong-Gil Lee () and Sung-Yoon Huh ()
Additional contact information
JongRoul Woo: Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MA 02139, USA
Sesil Lim: Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Yong-Gil Lee: Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Inha University, Incheon 22212, South Korea
Sung-Yoon Huh: Department of Energy Policy, Seoul National University of Science & Technology, Seoul 01811, South Korea

Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, issue 11, 1-16

Abstract: Social acceptance of nuclear power has become a decisive factor in framing a sustainable energy policy. This study examines social acceptance for cancelling the construction of planned nuclear power plants (NPPs) and replacing them with other energy sources. The contingent valuation method (CVM) and cost–benefit analysis (CBA) are used to access the social acceptance and financial feasibility of such projects. Empirical analysis is based on the case of South Korea, where a similar policy is in progress under the new government. The CVM results show that a Korean household was willing to pay an additional KRW 1922.45/month (USD 1.80/month) for replacing seven 1-Gigawatt NPPs with other energy sources, which is about 3.5% of a household’s current electricity bill. The CBA suggests that the annual costs of replacing this amount of nuclear power capacity with renewables or liquefied natural gas is KRW 1291.40 billion (USD 1.21 billion) or KRW 1180.38 billion (USD 1.11 billion) larger than its benefits, which amounts to about 3% of total annual electricity generation costs in South Korea. As the additional costs of nuclear power replacement cannot be fully covered by the mean willingness-to-pay of the current acceptance level, moderate levels of social resistance are expected if all the additional costs are passed on to the end-users.

Keywords: social acceptance; nuclear power; renewable energy; liquefied natural gas; contingent valuation method; willingness to pay (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 O13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/3833/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/3833/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:3833-:d:177675

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Prof. Dr. Marc A. Rosen

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI, Open Access Journal
Bibliographic data for series maintained by XML Conversion Team ().

 
Page updated 2020-01-14
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:3833-:d:177675