Evaluation of the Grey Water Footprint Comparing the Indirect Effects of Different Agricultural Practices

Eros Borsato, Alejandro Galindo, Paolo Tarolli, Luigi Sartori and Francesco Marinello
Additional contact information
Eros Borsato: Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova, 35020 Agripolis, Italy
Alejandro Galindo: Department of Water Engineering & Management, Faculty of Engineering Technology, University of Twente. P.O. Box, 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
Paolo Tarolli: Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova, 35020 Agripolis, Italy
Luigi Sartori: Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova, 35020 Agripolis, Italy
Francesco Marinello: Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova, 35020 Agripolis, Italy

Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, issue 11, 1-15

Abstract: Increasing global food demand and economic growth result in increasing competition over scarce freshwater resources, worsened by climate change and pollution. The agricultural sector has the largest share in the water footprint of humanity. While most studies focus on estimating water footprints (WFs) of crops through modeling, there are only few experimental field studies. The current work aims to understand the effect of supposedly better agricultural practices, particularly precision agriculture (variable rate application of fertilizers and pesticides) and conservation agriculture (minimum, strip, or no-tillage), on water deterioration and water pollution. We analyzed the results from an experimental field study in the northeast of Italy, in which four different crops are grown across three years of crops rotation. We compared minimum, strip, and no-tillage systems undergoing variable to uniform rate application. Grey WFs are assessed based on a field dataset using yield maps data, soil texture, and crop operations field. Leaching and associated grey WFs are assessed based on application rates and various environmental factors. Yields are measured in the field and recorded in a precision map. The results illustrate how precision agriculture combined with soil conservation tillage systems can reduce the grey water footprint by the 10%. We assessed the grey Water Footprint for all the field operation processes during the three-year crop rotation.

Keywords: water footprint; conservation tillage systems; precision agriculture; sustainable management; agriculture soil practices; impact reduction (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/3992/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/3992/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:3992-:d:179739

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().