Influence of Reduced Ownership on the Environmental Benefits of the Circular Economy

Seppo Junnila, Juudit Ottelin and Laura Leinikka
Additional contact information
Seppo Junnila: Department of Built Environment, School of Engineering, Aalto University, Otakaari 4, P.O. Box 14100, AALTO-FIN, 00076 Helsinki, Finland
Juudit Ottelin: Department of Built Environment, School of Engineering, Aalto University, Otakaari 4, P.O. Box 14100, AALTO-FIN, 00076 Helsinki, Finland
Laura Leinikka: Department of Built Environment, School of Engineering, Aalto University, Otakaari 4, P.O. Box 14100, AALTO-FIN, 00076 Helsinki, Finland

Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, issue 11, 1-13

Abstract: The circular economy has become a popular concept, suggesting economic growth with fewer emissions and reduced ownership as one of its key parameters. Based on the literature, however, it appears that the concept has not been sufficiently contested empirically. This study evaluates the carbon and material footprint implications of reduced ownership in the context of household consumption. We found that the reduced ownership does not automatically reduce the environmental impact of the production–consumption system in the context of households. Reduced ownership in the study did not have any noticeable influence on material footprint, and in the case of carbon footprint, it only had a mild positive influence in low-income households. The result is surprising, since both intuitively as well as based on the literature, moving from ownership to services should increase resource efficiency and reduce environmental impact. In the context of households, actual consumption and investment behavior seem to override the theoretical benefits of reduced ownership. In our study, the circular economy rebound and the willingness to invest in green products seems to explain quite well why the environmental impact of consumption is not reduced when households move from ownership to services. Households appear to spend the money saved from reduced ownership on carbon-intensive services; when they own the products themselves, they invest a more-than-average amount in the life cycle performance of the products. The paper’s implications for the circular economy as a concept for decoupling economic growth from environmental pressure is that one of its primary qualities, sharing and renting services instead of owning things, seems to offer only a partial solution for the dilemma. In order to fully benefit from reduced ownership, the circular economy should emphasize simultaneous change in both the production and consumption of services, as it seems that simply offering products for rent does not automatically reduce the environmental impact of the final demand.

Keywords: circular economy; carbon footprint; material footprint; consumption patterns; household expenditure; sharing economy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/4077/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/4077/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:4077-:d:181071

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().