Evaluation of a New Machine for Flower and Fruit Thinning in Stone Fruits

Alberto Assirelli, Daniela Giovannini, Mattia Cacchi, Sandro Sirri, Gianluca Baruzzi and Giuseppina Caracciolo
Additional contact information
Alberto Assirelli: CREA—Centro di ricerca Ingegneria e Trasformazioni, via Della Pascolare, 16, 00016 Monterotondo, Italy
Daniela Giovannini: CREA—Centro di ricerca Olivicoltura, Frutticoltura e Agrumicoltura, via la Canapona 1 bis, 47121 Forlì, Italy
Mattia Cacchi: CREA—Centro di ricerca Olivicoltura, Frutticoltura e Agrumicoltura, via la Canapona 1 bis, 47121 Forlì, Italy
Sandro Sirri: CREA—Centro di ricerca Olivicoltura, Frutticoltura e Agrumicoltura, via la Canapona 1 bis, 47121 Forlì, Italy
Gianluca Baruzzi: CREA—Centro di ricerca Olivicoltura, Frutticoltura e Agrumicoltura, via la Canapona 1 bis, 47121 Forlì, Italy
Giuseppina Caracciolo: CREA—Centro di ricerca Olivicoltura, Frutticoltura e Agrumicoltura, via la Canapona 1 bis, 47121 Forlì, Italy

Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, issue 11, 1-12

Abstract: Peach and apricot trees usually set more fruit than they can adequately support. Crop load adjustment through fruit thinning is a routine practice adopted by fruit growers to obtain a marketable product. However, hand thinning is an expensive, labor-intense operation. The interest in the mechanization of thinning has increased in the last decades. A new machine, consisting of a tractor-mounted rotor equipped with elastic rods radially inserted on a central axis, has been recently developed to thin both flowers and green fruits in stone fruit crops. In order to test its effectiveness and optimize the operative conditions, trials were carried out in 2016 in two apricot and two peach commercial orchards located in the northeast Italy. Tests were carried out on narrow-canopied orchards, during blooming time, and on green fruit, assessing the flower and fruit removal percentage and the labor saving as compared with the standard fruit hand-thinning practice. In apricot, the machine removed 20.8% of flowers and 43.6% of fruit, allowing 48% time saving in the follow-up fruit manual thinning as compared with the control (hand-thinning only). In peach, mechanical thinning at blooming time removed 63% of flowers, allowing 42.4% time saving in the follow-up fruit manual thinning as compared with the control, whereas mechanical thinning of fruit at the beginning of pit hardening stage removed less than 10%. The development of a mechanical thinning practice, complemented by a manual finishing, could represent a valuable near-term solution to reduce thinning labor time.

Keywords: apricot; peach; fruit load; drop; canopy; shoot length (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/4088/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/4088/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:4088-:d:181241

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().