EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Mission Impossible? Socio-Technical Integration of Nuclear Waste Geological Disposal Systems

François Diaz-Maurin and Rodney C. Ewing
Additional contact information
François Diaz-Maurin: Center for International Security and Cooperation (CISAC), Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Rodney C. Ewing: Center for International Security and Cooperation (CISAC), Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA

Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, issue 12, 1-39

Abstract: We present a new perspective on geological disposal systems for nuclear waste. Geological disposal systems encompass all the processes required for the permanent isolation of highly-radioactive materials from humans and the biosphere. Radioactive materials requiring geological disposal are created by commercial nuclear power plants, research reactors, and defense-related nuclear activities, such as spent nuclear fuel from commercial reactors and high-level waste from reprocessing to reclaim fissile material for weapons. We show that disposal systems are so complex that new methods of representation are required. Despite the common call for a systems approach, a broader perspective is needed to obtain an integrated view of disposal systems. We introduce a conceptual formalism of geological disposal systems based on a multi-scale integrated analysis approach. This ‘metabolic’ representation allows one to account for the technical complexity of disposal systems in relation to their broader societal context. Although the paper is conceptual, the integrated formalism can improve the understanding of the complexity of disposal systems and their policy requirements by connecting technical solutions with societal constraints. However, the paper also reveals the limits to efforts to integrate technical and social dimensions of geological disposal systems into a single formalism.

Keywords: radioactive waste; spent nuclear fuel; high-level waste; transuranic waste; geological disposal; repository design; Yucca Mountain; WIPP; integrated analysis; knowledge organization; complex systems; science-policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4390/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4390/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4390-:d:185232

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4390-:d:185232