Collective Civic Petitions in Urban Neighborhoods: A Comparative Study between Two Different-Tier Chinese Cities

Le Tang, Fengqin Zhou, Xueliang Feng and Yali Luo
Additional contact information
Le Tang: Faculty of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Huaiyin Insitition of Technology, Huai’an 223001, China
Fengqin Zhou: Faculty of Foreign Language, Huaiyin Insitition of Technology, Huai’an 223001, China
Xueliang Feng: Faculty of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Huaiyin Insitition of Technology, Huai’an 223001, China
Yali Luo: Faculty of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Huaiyin Insitition of Technology, Huai’an 223001, China

Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, issue 12, 1-17

Abstract: This paper engages with civic development in urban neighborhoods in China after the period of reform that began in 1978. Examining the collective civic petitions that have occurred in urban neighborhoods, the paper offers a comparative analysis of changing trends, internal mechanisms, and their spatial distribution between two different-tier cities. Data pertaining to the collective civic petitions was drawn from open archives in two municipal bureaus, and related to the years 2013 to 2015. The data was then split into three types of petition typology—claim, protest, and hybrid. Certain similarities and differences emerged from the analysis relating to the types of petition that have occurred against different petition counterparties, namely, state authorities, real developers, and property management companies. Similarities among the two cities could be capable of indicating advancing urban civic developments with internal mechanisms among petition typology and contexts of individual petitions. Differences among the two cities could be related to various differences in their urban contexts, and may also reflect different levels of citizen civic consciousness and behavior.

Keywords: civic development; collective civic petitions; urban neighborhoods; petition types; spatial concentrations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4660/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4660/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4660-:d:188692

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().