EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Dynamics of Cooperation in Minority Games in Alliance Networks

Xin-Jie Zhang (), Yong Tang (), Jason Xiong (), Wei-Jia Wang () and Yi-Cheng Zhang ()
Additional contact information
Xin-Jie Zhang: School of Management and Economics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China
Yong Tang: School of Management and Economics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China
Jason Xiong: Walker College of Business, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC 28608-2037, USA
Wei-Jia Wang: School of Information and Software Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China
Yi-Cheng Zhang: Department of Physics, University of Fribourg, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland

Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, issue 12, 1-17

Abstract: Alliance networks are the underlying structures of social systems in business, management, and society. The sustainability and dynamics of a social system rely on the structural evolutions of the topologies. Understanding the evolution sheds light on the dynamics and sustainability of a social system. Minority game models have been successfully applied across social science, economy, management, and engineering. They provide simple yet applicable modeling to articulate the evolutionary cooperation dynamics of competitive players in binary decision situations. By extending the minority games played in alliance networks, the cooperation in structured systems of different network topologies is analyzed. In this model, local and global score strategies are considered with and without cooperation rewiring options. The cooperation level, the score, and the topological properties are investigated. The research uses a numerical simulation approach on random networks, scale-free networks, and small-world networks. The results suggest that the network rewiring strategy leads to higher systemic performance with a higher score and a higher level of stability in decision-making. Competitive decision-making can lead to a higher level of cooperation from a poor initial start. However, stubbornness in decision-making can lead to a poor situation when cooperation is discouraged. Players with local or global information adopt local and global score strategies. The results show that local strategies might lead to imbalance, while a global strategy might achieve a relatively stable outcome. This work contributes to bridge minority games in structured networks to study the cooperation between formation and evolution, and calls for future minority game modeling on social networks.

Keywords: cooperation; evolutionary game; minority game; social network; agent-based systems (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 O13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4746/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4746/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4746-:d:190075

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Prof. Dr. Marc A. Rosen

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI, Open Access Journal
Bibliographic data for series maintained by XML Conversion Team ().

 
Page updated 2018-12-22
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4746-:d:190075