Assessment of Soil Organic Carbon Storage in Vegetable Farms Using Different Farming Practices in the Kanto Region of Japan

Eri Matsuura, Masakazu Komatsuzaki and Rahmatullah Hashimi
Additional contact information
Eri Matsuura: Graduate School of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Fuchu 183-0057, Japan
Masakazu Komatsuzaki: Center for Field Science Research & Education, Collage of Agriculture, Ibaraki University, Ami 300-0393, Japan
Rahmatullah Hashimi: Faculty of Agriculture, Shaikh Zayed University, Khost 2504, Afghanistan

Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, issue 1, 1-17

Abstract: Agricultural fields can store substantial amounts of atmospheric carbon in the soil. In 2011, the Environmentally Friendly Farming Direct Payment Program (EFFDPP) began as a way to promote sustainable agriculture, but the approved methods for receiving the subsidy are limited to the use of manure and cover crops. For evaluating other options for the EFFDPP, we calculated soil carbon inputs and CO 2 emissions in four nature farming (NF) systems for comparisons with conventional farming (CF) and environmentally friendly farming (EF) systems. In 2015, we collected data on farm management from interviews and conducted a field experiment for NF. According to the calculations using a modified Roth C model, the ability for soil carbon sequestration predicted over the next 20 years is the highest in a no-till NF system with grass mulching. CO 2 emission per ha for CF was 4.8 tCO 2 /ha, which was eight times higher than that for NF. However, the highest CO 2 emission per kg of crop was noted in NF with no grass mulching due to very low yield. The total CO 2 emission for CF was similar to that for EF. The NF systems were beneficial in reducing CO 2 emission, but a combination of other approaches is required for satisfying EFFDPP criteria.

Keywords: environmentally friendly farming; life cycle assessment; carbon sequestration; nature farming; grass mulching (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/1/152/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/1/152/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:152-:d:126146

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().