EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Conservation Agriculture for Environmental Sustainability in A Semiarid Agroecological Zone under Climate Change Scenarios

Zhang Hong, Msafiri Y. Mkonda and Xinhua He
Additional contact information
Zhang Hong: Centre of Excellence for Soil Biology, College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
Msafiri Y. Mkonda: Centre of Excellence for Soil Biology, College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
Xinhua He: Centre of Excellence for Soil Biology, College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China

Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, issue 5, 1-19

Abstract: Using the Mann–Kendall Test to analyze data from a survey of 400 farmers, this study compared the rate of adoption of conservation agriculture (CA) in two contrasting villages of Mnyakongo and Ugogoni locating in the Kongwa District, a semi-arid zone in central Tanzania. Results exhibited that the level of CA adoption was <10% of the total households. The trend of CA adoption was determined at the coefficient of R 2 = 0.95, 0.90, 0.68 and 0.57 for mulching, crop rotation, agroforestry and little tillage, respectively. Despite little tillage and crop rotation having high acreage under CA, the rate of mulching adoption was significantly higher than that of others. Furthermore, there were significant correlations between the CA adoption and crop yields or environmental sustainability ( p < 0.05). Maize, sorghum and millet yields were significantly greater under CA (1.7 t ha −1 ) than no-CA (0.7 t ha −1 ). Particularly, maize yields were increased from 1.3 to 2.3 t ha −1 from 2000 to 2015 under CA when it was intercropped with legumes. The majority farmers (>70%) asserted that CA had optimized their yields for both food and economic incentives. Thus, this study recommends the adoption of CA in the semi-arid agro-ecological zones.

Keywords: climate change; crop yields; environmental services; intercropping; legumes; Mann–Kendall test; vulnerability; Tanzania (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1430/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1430/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1430-:d:144588

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1430-:d:144588