An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model and AHP Weighting Uncertainty Analysis for Sustainability Assessment of Coal-Fired Power Units

Dianfa Wu, Zhiping Yang, Ningling Wang, Chengzhou Li and Yongping Yang
Additional contact information
Dianfa Wu: National Research Center for Thermal Power Engineering and Technology, North China Electric Power University, Changping District, Beijing 102206, China
Zhiping Yang: National Research Center for Thermal Power Engineering and Technology, North China Electric Power University, Changping District, Beijing 102206, China
Ningling Wang: National Research Center for Thermal Power Engineering and Technology, North China Electric Power University, Changping District, Beijing 102206, China
Chengzhou Li: National Research Center for Thermal Power Engineering and Technology, North China Electric Power University, Changping District, Beijing 102206, China
Yongping Yang: National Research Center for Thermal Power Engineering and Technology, North China Electric Power University, Changping District, Beijing 102206, China

Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, issue 6, 1-27

Abstract: The transformation of the power generation industry from coal-based to more sustainable energy sources is an irreversible trend. In China, the coal-fired power plant, as the main electric power supply facility at present, needs to know its own sustainability level to face the future competition. A hybrid multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) model is proposed in this paper to assess the sustainability levels of the existing Chinese coal-fired power units. The areal grey relational analysis (AGRA) method is involved in the hybrid model, and a combined weighting method is used to determine the priorities of the criteria. The combining weight fuses the fuzzy rough set (FRS) and entropy objective weighting method together with the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) subjective weighting method by game theory. Moreover, an AHP weighting uncertainty analysis using Monte Carlo (MC) simulation is introduced to measure the uncertainty of the results, and a 95 percent confidence interval (CI) is defined as the uncertainty measurement of the alternatives. A case study about eight coal-fired power units is carried out with a criteria system, which contains five aspects in an operational perspective, such as the flexibility, economic, environmental, reliability and technical criterion. The sustainability assessment is performed at the unit level, and the results give a priority rank of the eight alternatives; additionally, the uncertainty analysis supplies the extra information from a statistical perspective. This work expands a novel hybrid MCDM method to the sustainability assessment of the power generation systems, and it may be a benefit to the energy enterprises in assessing the sustainability at the unit level and enhance its ability in future sustainable development.

Keywords: areal grey relational analysis; fuzzy rough set; game theory; AHP; uncertainty analysis; coal-fired power unit (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/1700/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/1700/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:6:p:1700-:d:148536

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().